http://pursuitmag.com/background-investigation-or-reputational-due-diligence-model/ A Magazine for Private Investigators and other Investigation Professionals Tue, 15 May 2012 13:50:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://pursuitmag.com/background-investigation-or-reputational-due-diligence-model/#comment-818 Review: Practical Methods for Legal Investigations Concepts and Protocols in Civil and Criminal Cases | Pursuit Magazine Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:25:42 +0000 http://pursuitmag.com/?p=12761#comment-818 [...] Comprehensive Background Investigations [...] [...] Comprehensive Background Investigations [...]

]]> http://pursuitmag.com/background-investigation-or-reputational-due-diligence-model/#comment-817 AegisJournal Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:05:46 +0000 http://pursuitmag.com/?p=12761#comment-817 Great Article! If you want to learn more about due diligence you should read Due Diligence for the Financial Professional by L. Burke Files. It is a well written guide to the thought process and not just another book of mindless check lists. Great Article! If you want to learn more about due diligence you should read Due Diligence for the Financial Professional by L. Burke Files. It is a well written guide to the thought process and not just another book of mindless check lists.

]]> http://pursuitmag.com/background-investigation-or-reputational-due-diligence-model/#comment-816 Friedrich Haas Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:59:00 +0000 http://pursuitmag.com/?p=12761#comment-816 Good points Thomas - but I am fine with adding to financial, ... due dilligence another step and label it "reputational ...". As long as we can agree what's behind this label, I would not hesitate to use this term. But I would 100% support your point - it's about digging deeper and to do it with a common sense. BUT ... a good common sense needs a good educational background,too. Missing general education leading to sometimes íncredible naivity of narrow minded specialists, nerds, is what makes it difficult to find good guys for analysis and gathering the relevant background information. They are simply bad in communication, relationship management, being sensitive for information, etc.. Good points Thomas – but I am fine with adding to financial, … due dilligence another step and label it “reputational …”. As long as we can agree what’s behind this label, I would not hesitate to use this term. But I would 100% support your point – it’s about digging deeper and to do it with a common sense. BUT … a good common sense needs a good educational background,too. Missing general education leading to sometimes íncredible naivity of narrow minded specialists, nerds, is what makes it difficult to find good guys for analysis and gathering the relevant background information. They are simply bad in communication, relationship management, being sensitive for information, etc..

]]>